How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18926362691019082362/ On the one hand you can terminate grants. . . on the other hand you can't.
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18902307169293067242/ Thoughts to follow. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18923248550489746372/ Here's full response: Comments to follow. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18924306161188866212/ Here's link: Highlights to follow.storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18893939255441166672/ Here's court's decision denying TRO, which highlights underlying legal issue. Facts obtained through discovery won't change legal question of whether DOGE can assign folks to agencies. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18913324107819257652/ Here's link to termination notice: Of relevance, note that the termination notice expressly quotes the authority held to fire these USAID workers & the terms under which they can be fire. And note the name on the letter--it ain't @elonmusk. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18922300759379314362/ Here's Dellinger's Response: supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/2…
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18901649221910815482/ Order here, summary to follow: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18902307169293067242/ Finally got in: Judge asking whether parties considered whether resolving on expedited merits basis as some of colleagues have done.
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1890164922191081548
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18915192295489785472/ in my view utterly failed to show what was imminent that could not be fixed later, which is what a TRO is for. Cutting grants can be cured. Firing folks can be undone. Judge also seemed concerned that access to info wasn't the issue--but the cuts & firings.
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18914976308589650192/ Full docket: courtlistener.com/docket/6963865…
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18913324107819257652/ Count 1 is an Appointments Clause count and count 2 a separation of powers count. Appointments Clause claim mirrors one up for consideration tomorrow in D.C. D.Ct. 👀@fdrlst tomorrow where I explain why that claim is fatally flaws.
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18901649221910815482/ Full proposed order. That court it to be filed on Saturday suggest is will be entered over weekend. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1889350982498128130
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18900682260858963592/ Judge is ripping him a new one!!! With # of TROs for judges & clerks dealing with. . . . you filed this now!! "I have no problem addressing a PI," she said we are on Rule 11 territory especially since comparing to Dellinger case. Would you like to w/d TRO & Gov't Rule 11 sanction request.
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18902382737648890482/ So here's what Court enjoined, saying Trump Administration could NOT freeze, suspend, blah, blah, blah funding, grants, etc. Big deal, right? Constitutionally speaking it is, but practically? Let's continue.
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18893360007546554922/ Because Plaintiffs are all seeking injunctions, Trump will be able to appeal preliminary injunctions immediately. Such appeals are expedited & so the America First agenda will not be tied up in courts for long. ALSO, most of TROs entered have major flaws making them ripe
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/18893363937777873742/ Motion to Dismiss appeal: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…