Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #twitterpeerreview
Most recents (1)
Hi @FrontiersIn : A paper of yours (editor: @GetchellNancy) missed some very important (and honestly basic) statistical issues, and is contributing to a narrative that is not supported by the paper.
#twitterpeerreview
#reviewer2stepsinanddoesthejob
#statstwitter
#twitterpeerreview
#reviewer2stepsinanddoesthejob
#statstwitter
The paper should have been challenged on review:
* why not iterate 1 year vs other 5 years for all years '16-20 (resolves all issues)
* why not challenge the finding in "communication at 1 year" increasing for 2020 when clearly the significance comes from the low 2017 #
/2
* why not iterate 1 year vs other 5 years for all years '16-20 (resolves all issues)
* why not challenge the finding in "communication at 1 year" increasing for 2020 when clearly the significance comes from the low 2017 #
/2
Had it done so, the conclusion of the paper would be markedly different: "2020 showed similar and expected fluctuations as has been seen in the prior 5 years in all domains," and it would not be used as evidence that "pandemic measures effects harm child development"
/3
/3
