Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #preregistration
Most recents (3)
You are looking to design, review or even preregister an #fNIRS study? Our newest article "Using #preregistration as a tool for transparent fNIRS study design" may be just the right place to start! #OpenScience @SfNIRS
Preprint: osf.io/preprints/meta…
A short 🧵👇 ...
Preprint: osf.io/preprints/meta…
A short 🧵👇 ...
On a step-by-step basis, we take the reader through all important aspects of study design – including the specification of hypotheses, sampling plan, analysis plan, and preprocessing pipeline – and thus provide guidance in planning a state-of-the-art fNIRS study. 2/7 
To support researchers, we developed the "Preregistration for fNIRS Research (PRE-fNIRS) Template", adapting the established PRP-QUANT towards fNIRS research-specific needs and adding examples for fNIRS-specific items. 3/7
osf.io/hb4um/
osf.io/hb4um/
@TheGPhC @gmabbam @prof_standards @the_pda @rpharms @BTLGroup @BBCNews @DailyMailUK @Telegraph @nadhimzahawi
A thread highlighting the incompetence of the general pharmaceutical council (GPhC), assessment provider (BTL) and examination issues. READ BELOW...
A thread highlighting the incompetence of the general pharmaceutical council (GPhC), assessment provider (BTL) and examination issues. READ BELOW...
On Wednesday 29/06/2022, thousands of pre-registration pharmacists sat an extremely pivotal exam, the result of which determines their future- whether they will be allowed to practice as a pharmacist despite 4 years of study and a further year of training on the job.
The exam; set out in 2 parts- calculations (40 questions; 3 minutes per question) and clinical (120 questions; 1.25 minutes per question) over the course of 4.5 hours.
Not only are we required to pass both elements of the exam but we are also required to achieve 70% in EACH!!!
Not only are we required to pass both elements of the exam but we are also required to achieve 70% in EACH!!!
I am embarking on my own #PaperPerDayChallenge where I read at least one paper, well, per day for a whole year. To kick start, nature.com/articles/43573… inspired by @ukrepro Reproducibility Workshop @CumberlandLodge and a talk by @MarcusMunafo
Paper #2: Hard not be cynical about advocates of reproducibile science given most have careers built on the very questionable practices they wish to stamp out, so great to see @russpoldrack tackling this head on and offering great advice along the way 👍 ac.els-cdn.com/S0896627318310…
Paper #3 - false positives from multiple testing in anovas and importance of distinguishing exploratory and confirmatory hypotheses — also I thought anovas corrected for Multiple testing and this paper shows so too do many others, I’m not the only idiot! link.springer.com/content/pdf/10…
