Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #coherent
Most recents (2)
So the outgoing co-chair of the #MIGOP wrote a meandering diatribe warning the MAGA faithful of false prophets. She wonāt name names, nor is she handing out endorsements for MIGOP chair. I thought Iād do some quick takes: š§µ
Her initial question is if a candidate has run a winning campaignā¦ good question. By this metric all candidates are disqualified; but she keeps going. This must not be a true metric for her. She says thereās a š among the pack, but wonāt name names. š¤ 
Her next metric is competence. This should eliminate the entire pack, but again, she keeps expounding. She says the best candidate should be able to tap into an established donor base. Thatās all well & good, but she was part of alienating that donor base. It really sounds like
Unclear why the @guardian would lowball #COVID19 deaths ("one in 20"?) across the #SocialCare sector here:
theguardian.com/society/2020/jā¦
Why use out-of-date, back-of-a-fag-packet guesstimates when we have actual figures? š
13.6% is one in seven people.
*ONE IN SEVEN*, not 1 in 20!
theguardian.com/society/2020/jā¦
Why use out-of-date, back-of-a-fag-packet guesstimates when we have actual figures? š
13.6% is one in seven people.
*ONE IN SEVEN*, not 1 in 20!
While we're on the topic, @BorisJohnson's pledge š on becoming PM failed to even appear in his 2019 manifesto.
@MattHancock's letter of 6 March 2020 showed @10DowningStreet's "plan" didn't even exist:
So, with #trust collapsing:
homecareinsight.co.uk/pm-not-trustedā¦
@MattHancock's letter of 6 March 2020 showed @10DowningStreet's "plan" didn't even exist:
So, with #trust collapsing:
homecareinsight.co.uk/pm-not-trustedā¦
Let's be clear what's needed ain't just another "centralised systemā (i.e. another costly care.data-style debacle) but a #coherent, #interoperable, #consensual, #safe & #transparent 21stC #InformationSystem, to flow #DataThatCares along #CarePathways & show #stats we need to know
