Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #ayodhyacase
Most recents (14)
Judges signing the verdict
Judgement is unanimous
#AyodhyaCase
#AyodhyaCase
#AyodhyaCase: A Supreme Court Bench of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer will pronounce verdict at 10.30 am today
Track this thread for live updates
#RamMandir #BabriMasjid #AYODHYAVERDICT #AyodhyaHearing
Track this thread for live updates
#RamMandir #BabriMasjid #AYODHYAVERDICT #AyodhyaHearing
Here are the 5 Judges who will deliver the #AYODHYAVERDICT today.
#AyodhyaHearing #BabriMasjid #AyodhyaJudgment
CJI Ranjan Gogoi
Next CJI Justice SA Bobde
Justice Ashok Bhushan
Justice DY Chandrachud
Justice Abdul Nazeer
#AyodhyaHearing #BabriMasjid #AyodhyaJudgment
CJI Ranjan Gogoi
Next CJI Justice SA Bobde
Justice Ashok Bhushan
Justice DY Chandrachud
Justice Abdul Nazeer
Day 40 of the hearing in the #Ayodhyacase begins with the #CJI making it clear that arguments will close at 5 pm today. "Enough is enough," says Justice Gogoi.
#AyodhyaCase
#BabriMasjid
#RamMandir
#AyodhyaCase
#BabriMasjid
#RamMandir
Sr adv CS Vaidyanathan resumes his arguments, saying the #Muslim side hasn't given any evidence on exclusive possession or title.
#AyodhyaCase
#RamMandir
#BabriMasjid
#AyodhyaCase
#RamMandir
#BabriMasjid
Vaidyanathan argues there could be some evidence that the #Muslim side offered Friday prayers at the disputed site between 1857 & 1934. "But there is absolutely no evidence that they offered any prayer after that. On the other hand, #Hindus continued to worship".
#AyodhyaCase
#AyodhyaCase
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Constitution Bench assembles on Day 40 of the hearing.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi declares that at 5 PM today the hearing in the case will have concluded.
"We have already asked all the intervenors to apportion the time accordingly"
"We have already asked all the intervenors to apportion the time accordingly"
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Senior Counsel CS Vaidyanathan concludes his rejoinder arguments.
Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar begins his rejoinder submissions
Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar begins his rejoinder submissions
#AyodhyaHearing
A five-judge bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has assembled.
As directed by CJI, the lawyers in all applications and petitions are handing over written submissions.
A five-judge bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has assembled.
As directed by CJI, the lawyers in all applications and petitions are handing over written submissions.
#AyodhyaHearing
A lawyer asks for some time to argue.
CJI: we have told you that at 5 PM today this case ends. Enough is enough.
A lawyer asks for some time to argue.
CJI: we have told you that at 5 PM today this case ends. Enough is enough.
Sr. Adv CS Vaidyanathan for Ram Lalla continues his submission on ouster and possession, "they have not been able to prove complete ouster or exclusive possession".
Day 23
Ayodhya case hearing.
A five-judge bench comprising the CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
Senior advocate Zafaryab Jillani commences arguments for Sunni Waqf Board.
#AyodhyaHearing
Ayodhya case hearing.
A five-judge bench comprising the CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
Senior advocate Zafaryab Jillani commences arguments for Sunni Waqf Board.
#AyodhyaHearing
ZJ: Referring to a 1942 suit between the Nirmohis, Mr. Zafaryab Jilani points out that the disputed property had been identified as a mosque.
Referring to grant of permission to access the building to Muslims, Mr. Jilani submits "It cannot be said that that building was being used as anything except mosque."
#AyodhyaHearing
#AyodhyaHearing
Day 18
#Ayodhya case.
Supreme Court issues contempt notice to Prof N Shanmugam for allegedly threatening Sr. advocate Dhavan for representing Muslim parties.
#Ayodhya case.
Supreme Court issues contempt notice to Prof N Shanmugam for allegedly threatening Sr. advocate Dhavan for representing Muslim parties.
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan (RS) resumes his arguments on behalf of Sunni Waqf Board.
#AyodhyaHearing
#AyodhyaHearing
Dr. Rajeev Dhavan arguing for the plaintiffs in suit 4 is reading out excerpts from the written statement of Hindu Maha Sabha, represented by Adv. H S Jain to indicate the averments made therein.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Day 17 in Supreme Court today.
Muslim parties will commence their arguments.
#ayodhyacase
Muslim parties will commence their arguments.
#ayodhyacase
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Sr. Adv. Kapil Sibal mentions application for contempt filed by Sr. Adv Rajeev Dhavan on the threat received by Dhavan for appearing for Muslim party.
CJI Ranjan Gogoi agrees to list it tomorrow.
CJI Ranjan Gogoi agrees to list it tomorrow.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid:
Rajeev Dhavan apologises to Bench for comments in media and to Sr. adv PN Mishra.
"It is universally recognised that I can be irritating", says Dhavan.
Rajeev Dhavan apologises to Bench for comments in media and to Sr. adv PN Mishra.
"It is universally recognised that I can be irritating", says Dhavan.
Day 16
#AyodhyaHearing
A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
Hearing resumed.
#AyodhyaHearing
A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
Hearing resumed.
Sr. Adv. P N Mishra continuing.
P N Mishra reading out a hadith to indicate that in prophet's time when dispute arose between Muslims and Jews, Justice was administered by the book of the Jews.
#AyodhyaHearing
P N Mishra reading out a hadith to indicate that in prophet's time when dispute arose between Muslims and Jews, Justice was administered by the book of the Jews.
#AyodhyaHearing
PN Mishra is also submitting, with support of Hadith, that 2 qibla (direction of worship) in one place. He submits that 2 places of religious worship cannot exist in the same site.
#AyodhyaHearing
#AyodhyaHearing
Day 11
#AyodhyaHearing
A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
#AyodhyaHearing
A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
Jain: My lords had put a question, I'll answer but the matter is serious and I'll need a little time.
CJI: We are looking for pin pointing arguments.
Jain: My lords just give the same courtesy as given in Suit 5.
#AyodhyaCase
CJI: We are looking for pin pointing arguments.
Jain: My lords just give the same courtesy as given in Suit 5.
#AyodhyaCase
CJI: No Mr. Jain you have extensively argued on Limitation already, you have to argue on oral and documentary evidence, for that you take a day, it won't take a week.
Day 10
#AyodhyaCase
A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar (RK) resumes arguments for plaintiff in Suit No.1 (Gopal Singh Visharad)
#ayodhyadisputehearing
#AyodhyaCase
A five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan & Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar (RK) resumes arguments for plaintiff in Suit No.1 (Gopal Singh Visharad)
#ayodhyadisputehearing
RK: What has been stated in the prayer is the place of Janmabhumi. I am adopting the argument of Mr. Parasaran and Mr. Vaidyanathan that the place itself is a diety and i have been worshipping it and it is civil right which should not be curtailed.
#ayodhyadisputehearing
#ayodhyadisputehearing
Reading WS of defendants Muslim parties, Mr. Ranjit Kumar submits that the 1885 proceedings that they claim would be acting as res judicata was only limited to Ram Chabutra.
#ayodhyadisputehearing
#ayodhyadisputehearing
Day 9
#AyodhyaHearing
Bench has assembled.
Senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan resumes his arguments for that deity (Ram Lalla).
#AyodhyaHearing
Bench has assembled.
Senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan resumes his arguments for that deity (Ram Lalla).
CSV: High Court having held that the suits are barred by time could not have granted the relief it granted. This is my submission. Relief granted to waqf board and Nirmohi Akhara is nothing contemplated in any law.
#AyodhyaHearing
#AyodhyaHearing
CSV now citing cases in support of submission that if hindus are having the belief and faith to worship the place of birth, it should be treated as religious worship.
#AyodhyaHearing
#AyodhyaHearing
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: Hearing resumes, Senior Advocate CS Vaidyanathan continuing with his submissions for Ram Lalla.
#Thread
#Thread
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: The defacto position is a building was demolished and another was constructed in the shape of a mosque. Despite that Hindus continued to visit the place and offer prayers, CS Vaidyanathan placing reliance on judgment of Justice Agarwal of Allahabad HC.
#RamMandir - #BabriMasjid: I submit that Artifacts and records clearly point to the fact that Ram Janambhoomi is the birth place of Lord Ram and that sanctity needs to be accorded to that place, CS Vaidyanathan.
Day 8
#AyodhyaHearing
Five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
Senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan resumes his arguments for the deity (Ram Lalla).
#AyodhyaHearing
Five-judge bench comprising CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer has assembled.
Senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan resumes his arguments for the deity (Ram Lalla).
CSV is reading report of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).
CSV: Muslim parties had first said that there is nothing beneath the land but later changed their case to the effect that what has been found beneath was probably an islamic structure.
#AyodhyaHearing
CSV: Muslim parties had first said that there is nothing beneath the land but later changed their case to the effect that what has been found beneath was probably an islamic structure.
#AyodhyaHearing
CSV: ASI has a reputation in this country and it is due to these considerations that yhe High Court accepted the report if the ASI.
#AyodhyaHearing
#AyodhyaHearing
