Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #SengolAtParliament
Most recents (3)
Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity Koorma Form July 18th SC Judgement quotation part of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute
"In adharma flowing frm wrong decision in a Court of law, one fourth each is attributed to the person committing the adharma, witness, the judges& the ruler"
"In adharma flowing frm wrong decision in a Court of law, one fourth each is attributed to the person committing the adharma, witness, the judges& the ruler"
The #SengolAtParliament reminds us of the practical truth of above statement from the story of Kannagi
The Hon'ble President and Hon'ble MPs who constitute Parliament cannot thus be powerless when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute is raised to correct through Art 143 ref
The Hon'ble President and Hon'ble MPs who constitute Parliament cannot thus be powerless when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute is raised to correct through Art 143 ref
Sengol in Parliament does bend when SC violates dharma by infringing on Rama Rajya pious purpose protected in Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights in our Constitutional Rama Rajya and when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute arises duty of Hon'ble President & Hon'ble MPs to correct
Sengol ritual of 14th Aug 1947 and how Rajaji who played integral part understood it with Shri Rama as Embodiment of Dharma in effect attaches Dr Radhakrishnan's definition of Objectives Resolution of Bharat to resoln body & then we compare with Pakistan
"Dharma, righteousness, is king of kings Dharmam Kshatrasya Kshatram It is ruler of both people & the Rulers themselves It is sovereignty of the law which we have asserted" this defn of Dr Radhakrishnan merger of Deity Kingdoms to form Bharat make sense
“Maharaja Chitra Tirunal Balarama Varma who was by tradition ruling on behalf of Absolute, brought Constitution of India into operation in Travancore with the consent of Deity Padmanabha Swamy after being promised goal of Rama Rajya” makes sense
The Sengol represents Constituent Assembly Rama Rajya Pledged guarantee as explained by Dr Radhakrishnan...
Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute resoln has established that this guarantee is enforceable in Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights when infringed
Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute resoln has established that this guarantee is enforceable in Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights when infringed
The pious purpose of Kanchi Paramacharya is the common link between #SengolAtParliament and Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute resolution thus Art 26 inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya and worded by Dr Ambedkar preserves Rama Rajya Sengol pious purpose
While people who worked for resolution of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute were unaware of Sengol importance same is true of people who worked to restore Sengol who have not publicly supported Art 363 dispute hence Kanchi Paramacharya pious purpose is common link of two
