Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #MadhuKishwar
Most recents (3)
#राममंदिरकापुजारीकौन
Laldas was appointed by a court of law as the chief priest in Ramjanmabhoomi temple in 1983. He vehemently opposed VHP.& demanded advani stop the rath yatra. He insisted ‘Hindus&Muslims of Ayodhya &Faizabad can resolve the issue themselves,’
He was shot dead.
Laldas was appointed by a court of law as the chief priest in Ramjanmabhoomi temple in 1983. He vehemently opposed VHP.& demanded advani stop the rath yatra. He insisted ‘Hindus&Muslims of Ayodhya &Faizabad can resolve the issue themselves,’
He was shot dead.
On March 1, 1992, he was removed from his position by the Kalyan Singh govt. On Dec 6, 1992, the Babri Masjid was destroyed. In these months, Laldas feared for his life & approached the local administration in Faizabad seeking protection, but his request went unheeded.
in an interview to #MadhuKishwar in 1992, he pointed out that 50-60 mahants had been murdered all over Ayodhya. “I wonder how a person like me is still alive”, he said in that conversation.
manushi-india.org/pdfs_issues/PD…
manushi-india.org/pdfs_issues/PD…
Peddling Fake News isnt new for #MadhuKishwar she has a daunting record of her own in making false claims,sharing fake pics and pelting untrue stories on SM which at times have put her in trouble but she hadn't learnt a thing and continues to be the torchbearer of Fake News(1/n)
Madhu Kishwar's fake news spree: Defends misleading video with another misleading video (2/n) altnews.in/madhu-kishwars…
Madhu Kishwar is a regular offender when it comes to sharing fake news and starting communal polarisation. (3/n)
boomlive.in/madhu-kishwars…
boomlive.in/madhu-kishwars…
#MiniBlogAsTweetStormAlert.
Sometimes I wonder if Twitter gets the worst out of us, or does it just provide an x-ray vision to our deep-rooted bigotry/hate? The 280 character limit leaves no place to hide our bigotry. With longer pieces, one gets ample opportunity for that 1/n
Sometimes I wonder if Twitter gets the worst out of us, or does it just provide an x-ray vision to our deep-rooted bigotry/hate? The 280 character limit leaves no place to hide our bigotry. With longer pieces, one gets ample opportunity for that 1/n
But in one or more tweets, one has no real protection. Plus, while it was a virtue to be "middle-of-the-road" person with earlier mediums, the nature of social media has taken away that advantage. Now, the more you cling to the edges, the better the response - RTs and likes. 2/n
So there is no tax for being openly extreme, but there could be a windfall -- sometimes even those who totally hate your point of view (the "other" extreme) will RT your tweets, with an outrage, but RT is RT. The counts go up. You're suddenly "viral". 3/n
