Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #LetsRoll

Most recents (8)

Condi Rice is, evidently, incapable of feeling shame.

Note she said "my party."

It's not MY party, anymore, I ran for the hills and am now firmly #XGOP. Not a liberal, either. I'm pro-democracy, period.

Condi is anti-democracy, and did NOTHING to stop Trump in 2016 or 2020.
1. There an be no clearer sign that Condoleezza Rice is, like McConnell, McCarthy and the rest, bought and paid for by wealthy donors. Not directly, but in the shadows.

2. #TheView only invited her onto the show to talk about the late Colin Powell. Instead, she...
... blatantly used the opportunity to act as an apologist for the GOP / GQP at a time when the survival of American democracy itself requires her to speak up.

3. As a black woman, she clearly doesn't care about the well-funded assault on voting rights that's more urgent than
Read 23 tweets
Today, Americans come together to remember and honor the victims of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001. The bravery and sacrifice of our fellow Americans on that day will never be forgotten. #NeverForget
In the face of adversity, Americans showed strength, bravery, unity and resolve – from first responders who risked their lives to save others, to the courageous actions of passengers aboard Flight 93. #LetsRoll
Counterterrorism remains a top priority for @realDonaldTrump. Under his leadership, we are pursuing terrorists wherever they are located - cutting them off from their sources of support and removing them from the battlefield.
Read 4 tweets
Yeah, you ever wonder how crazy Joe Biden or 44 or HRC got so many followers, likes or retweets? Here's how....

There are more SANE American citizens than we are led to believe. It's ALL a hoax! A Scam!!!

#WakeUpAmerica #LetsRoll #RollinWithReba
#VoteReba2020 #FL21 #RedTsunami
The political arena is full of FAKES on both sides of the aisle. You might be surprised to learn that not only do Dems pay people to promo their social media, but Reps do too. Not only that, but often the person to whom is given the credit is NEVER touching their accounts...
Read 9 tweets
Here's a quick hit on how to STOP Trump from weaponizing the courts. This CAN be done:

The Judicial Fix - Accelerated Dockets for Inter-Branch Governmental Disputes

Trump has successfully weaponized the courts. He knows he can bring a suit in federal court even if
his litigative position is flat-out frivolous. The problem is, even when a court agrees to “expedite” the case, it can take several months to file briefs, schedule & conduct necessary evidentiary hearings & oral arguments and get a final opinion from the court. When Trump loses,
it’s appeal time, which means more briefs, more oral arguments, more delay. Months can turn to years. Once Trump loses in the appellate court, it’s yet another appeal, this time to the Supreme Court. More briefs, more arguments and more waiting. In the meantime,
Read 19 tweets
1. It’s a good morning, IMO. We saw 10 politicians who sure seem determined to fight FOR the American people, FOR American values and FOR immigrants who long to to share America’s promise and prosperity. We’ll see 10 more quality candidates tonight. Mueller testifies soon...
2. Judges are ruling in favor of the enforceability of House subpoenas, ruling against Trump’s unsupportable claims (with more good judicial rulings to come on the executive privilege ridiculousness, IMO). On the flip side, Trump and his administration is imploding...
3. Trump recently announced he will commit crimes in the future by AGAIN accepting foreign information/interference in the upcoming elections. Yesterday, he told us that his private conversations with his boss, Vladimir Putin, is none of our business...
Read 4 tweets
1. If state court prosecutors have sufficient evidence to prove Trump committed crimes that violate state law, then the state prosecutors can and should indict him. This undoubtedly would result in modified “supremacy clause” litigation in the state court . . .
2. Although the Constitution’s supremacy clause isn’t directly applicable (providing that, when a federal law and a state law conflict w/one another, the federal law wins/is supreme), Trump’s lawyers would argue that those same principles prohibit a state court prosecution . . .
3. against a sitting president. But the benefits of a state indictment of a criminal president would be two-fold: 1. If a state court rules that a nothing in the Constitution prohibits a state from indicting & trying a criminal president, then we’re off to the justice races...
Read 6 tweets
1. Why impeachment? Well . . . Trump tried to steal the election by committing campaign finance violations AND by encouraging and accepting Russian assistance, including his campaign chairman sharing battle-ground polling data w/pro-Russian forces. He then obstructed justice ...
2. To try to cover up his campaign’s accepting Russian assistance AND lied to the American people about his business interests and aspirations in Russia. Trump refuses to even acknowledge what Mueller found to be sustained and systematic Russian interference in our elections...
3. Trump refuses to do anything to deter FUTURE Russian interference in our elections. The implications? Russia will double-down, unimpeded, and interfer in our 2020 presidential election to AGAIN help Trump. And the Dems are just going to let the 2020 election...
Read 4 tweets
1. The first two options to deal with Trump’s obstructionist conduct of declaring that administration members will refuse to comply with all Congressional subpoenas are ineffectual. Criminal contempt relies on AG Barr to do the right thing by having a US Attorney . . . .
2. pursue criminal contempt in court. Ain’t gonna happen. The second approach, civil enforcement, will involve a protracted court battle that could drag on for months. Here’s a third option: Congress could initiate impeachment hearings & subpoena every single witness with . . .
3. relevant evidence, every single witness the American people have a right to hear from regarding the crimes/misdeeds of this president & his administration. Then, we start calling witness to testify. If the witnesses comply with the subpoena then they testify . . .
Read 7 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!